Legalizing parents and other caregivers: a family immigration policy guided by a public ethic of care/
In this paper, we analyze political debates about headscarves and honor-related crimes in France and the Netherlands. We seek to explain why and how France and the Netherlands have come to unevenly politicize headscarves and honor crimes. Moreover, we try to understand how the argument of gender equ...
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | 0/Book/ 1/Book/Book/ |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | Visualizza in OPAC |
| Tags: |
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000007a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cru CIDCACS/IIS | ||
| 005 | 20260113162953.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 180118s2016 -uk|||p|r||||||0| ||eng|d | ||
| 040 | |c cru CIDCACS/IIS | ||
| 100 | 1 | |9 6417 |a Sullivan, Michael J. | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Legalizing parents and other caregivers: |b a family immigration policy guided by a public ethic of care/ |c Michael J. Sullivan | |
| 300 | |a páginas 263-283 | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, we analyze political debates about headscarves and honor-related crimes in France and the Netherlands. We seek to explain why and how France and the Netherlands have come to unevenly politicize headscarves and honor crimes. Moreover, we try to understand how the argument of gender equality is used by different actors in these policy debates. We argue that the agenda and demands of ethnic minority women′s organizations are selectively included and bent to serve other, non-feminist agendas. Ethnic minority women′s organizations and female ethnic minority politicians have acted as agenda-setters, calling attention to marginalization, discrimination, and experiences of violence. Yet these issues were co-opted by (mainly) right-wing politicians to problematize the “deviant” culture of minorities and propose policies that further exclude them and paternalize them instead of improving their situation. | ||
| 520 | |a En este artículo, analizamos los debates políticos sobre el uso del pañuelo y los crímenes relacionados con el honor en Francia y los Países Bajos. Buscamos explicar por qué y cómo Francia y los Países Bajos han llegado a politizar de forma desigual los pañuelos y los crímenes de honor. Además, intentamos entender cómo el argumento de la igualdad de género es utilizado por diferentes actores en estos debates políticos. Sostenemos que la agenda y las demandas de las organizaciones de mujeres de minorías étnicas se incluyen y se inclinan selectivamente para servir a otras agendas no feministas. Las organizaciones de mujeres de minorías étnicas y las políticas femeninas de minorías étnicas han actuado como marcadores de agendas, llamando la atención sobre la marginación, la discriminación y las experiencias de violencia. Sin embargo, estos temas fueron cooptados por políticos (principalmente) de derechas para problematizar la cultura "desviada" de las minorías y proponer políticas que las excluyan aún más y paternalizan en lugar de mejorar su situación. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a GENERO |9 964 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a EDUCACION POLITICA |9 3696 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a SOCIEDAD |9 26 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a IGUALDAD DE GENERO |9 4611 | |
| 650 | 0 | |a CRIMEN |9 1038 |v CRIMENES DE HONOR | |
| 650 | 0 | |a AGENDA |9 4724 |x POLITICA | |
| 650 | 0 | |a FEMINISMO |9 111 | |
| 651 | 0 | |a FRANCIA |9 4626 | |
| 651 | 0 | |a PAISES BAJOS |9 7912 | |
| 773 | 0 | |0 40836 |9 1747 |d Reino Unido : Oxford University Press |o 18460 |t Social Politics: |x 10724745 | |
| 942 | |2 ddc |c PP | ||
| 999 | |c 40843 |d 40843 | ||
